My Philosophical Interests, Writing, and Experience
(Please scroll down for CV & other documents)
Credo
'What is "pragmatic" about pragmatism is the recognition of a common structure to practical deliberation and cognitive inquiry in spite of the diversity of aims and values" -- Prof. Isaac Levi, The Fixation of Belief and Its Undoing, p. 78.
Today most philosophers of science believe that no important insights can be had by looking for such a "common structure to inquiry" (RBCT, as I called it). The collapse of the positivist-empiricist project, rise of the "weak program" and "strong program", and numerous other issues all seem to point in that direction.
I claim RBCT does play an important role, and inquirers (from physicists to economists and psychiatrists) take its epistemic desiderata -- to seek information and avoid error -- seriously. E.g., when some error is discovered in a previous experiment forces to give up some previously-held views, or when a shocking discovery makes it unclear what experiments must be performed next, researchers often obey RBCT's recommendations in preference to their "normal" way of research.
To say researchers are often implicitly committed to taking RBCT seriously is not to say RBCT is the (nonexistent) "real" scientific method, or that it obeying it demarcates "real" science from pseudoscience. But if we take epistemology and scientific inquiry seriously, in all its complexity, we must consider all the epistemic concerns real-life scientists do (or should) take seriously in their work, including RBCT.
Full CV, Publications, Teachings, and Referees
For full English CV go here .
My CV is also available in Hebrew. Last update: June 2010.
For a detailed publications, presentation, and teachings list,
as well as list of referees, click here. Last update: June 2010.